Skip to main content

Queer Community Calling, by Andrea Trevino

Kushner’s Angels in America not only functions as a piece of literature in form for a play which, in the end, will serve as an entertainment piece but more importantly, a breakthrough to social and queer calling of the community during the time of the AIDS epidemic. The play represents the impact of AIDS on the characters, their relationships with one another along with the community and country as a whole. Kushner takes us on a journey in which we witness two kinds of communities being destroyed and then recreated again. In the first part of Millennium, Roy’s character falls into loneliness as he distorts the law. This section is one which also shows the physical destruction of the Angel’s appearance at the end of Part One. Perestroika shows the repairmen of the crumbled bonds within the community in unconventional ways seen through Hanna and Prior’s and Prior and Harper’s relationships. The play’s most difficult character even in the end comes full circle in not being abandoned to the wilds of his isolation. His death links him to the communities which he abandoned; those who suffered from AIDS and even his Jewish roots.
All of these characters came to experience what it was like for the queer community to be seen as the sickness. The AIDs epidemic became surrounded by toxic rhetoric and pathology which saw it as a criminal disease which only added more fire to how homosexuality in the mid 1990’s was seen as a type of pedophilia—a threat to minor and children in the community. In Feinberg’s work, We Are All Works in Progress, sie alludes to the injustices the LGBTQ community faces in our health care system. On page 194, hir tells the story of hir encounter with a health care professional to diagnose his terribly sick symptoms. He said “you have a fever because you are a very troubled person.” Feinberg explains how the doctor’s prejudices, directed at sie during a moment of catastrophic illness, could have killed sie. Bigotry exacts its toll in flesh and blood which is why the play importantly challenges its audiences both in the mid 1990’s and now to think differently about HIV/AIDS. A scene in the play which reminded me of Feinberg’s encounter with the health professional is the interaction between Roy Conn and his doctor Henry in Act One, Scene Nine. Ironically it seems like the tables have turned in responses to symptoms of each individual because Roy’s deluded world does not consist of values such as love or trust but instead all human relationships can be strengthened and have the base of owing and doing favors or seconds needed in returning a phone call. Roy rambles on in trying to process his diagnosis, “Your problem, Henry, is that you are hung up on words, on labels, that you believe they mean what they seem to mean… Like all labels they tell you one thing and one thing only: where does an individual so identified fit in the food chain, in the pecking order? Not ideology, or sexual taste, but something much simpler: clout.” (Kindle Locations 964-966). I see Roy’s interaction with Henry as not only a denial of his diagnosis of HIV, but a processing of what his life will now be like because of how apart from the fatality of this disease but how he will be seen by society.
In a Seattle Times article titled “A Q&A with Tony Kushner on his ‘Angels in America’ revisiting the Intiman Theater” Kushner explains major themes such as the impact of AIDS on not only the characters but country as a whole. He also touches on another main theme that shapes the characters desires and identities; the theme of religion. When Kushner encounters the question of why he decided to write about the theme of AIDS, he responded with “I set out to write about what it was like to be me, a gay man in New York, in the mid 1980s, and it was not possible to do that without placing it in the middle of the epidemic. The world I was born into was receding and something new and rather terrifying was taking its place” (Berson, 2014). Two religions which are irreconcilably different—Jews and Mormons, are rarely linked in the popular imagination or indeed in real life. Mormons and Jews living alongside one another and with America itself. Both religions are separated from the wider society by their own focus as well as by prejudice and lack of understanding. Religious commandment to loyalty overshadows both Louis and Joe after they leave their partners, also adding to their feelings of guilt. The main theme I was intrigued by the heavy presence of religion was how both of them traditionally do not support homosexuality. As Kushner stated in the interview, “behind that breathtaking speed (of progress in the last decades) was because of incredibly dedicated work by many, many people who helped prepare the way.” That is what we should remember after this play

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog Post for Thursday, August 30—Welcome to “Justice, Gender, Sexuality”

Welcome to our course blog—“Justice, Gender, Sexuality”!  In this space, you’ll have the chance to reflect on our course reading, ask questions, interact with each other and build a virtual community to complement our classroom space. For this first post, I’d like to invite you to do two things:  First, tell us more about yourself.  What do you think we should know about you as we begin this semester together?  You might consider these questions:  Who are you?  How do you identify?  Where are you from?  To whom do you belong?  What communities are you a part of?  What values or beliefs do you hold dear?  Or, share some other facet about yourself that you think is significant.  You might also consider telling us more about why you decided to take this course, and what you hope to learn from it. Then, please reflect on the reading assigned for class.  Given ...

Blog Post for Tuesday, September 11: Intersectional Queerness

In preparation for Tuesday's class, I'd like you to do two things:  First, take a moment to reflect on the Brave Space Training.  What did you learn from this experience, and how are thinking and feeling about queer issues after last week's training? Second, identify a key issue or point from Hall's third chapter--"Queering Class, Race, Gender, and Sexual Understanding"--that you take to be central to understanding his larger argument in this chapter.  What is his point?  And what does he write (so make sure to integrate at least one quotation/citation from his writing that helps you in your analysis) that helps convey this point?  Last,  why do you think this point is important and what question(s) does it raise for you that you would like the rest of us to discuss in class on Tuesday? As usual, please aim for at least 250 words.  Include a quotation (cited, with page number) from the text, and take care to edit your response.  Thank you!

Blog Post for Tuesday, September 4: The Question of Queer History

Donald Hall opens our reading for Tuesday, by asking, “Is a ‘queer’ history even possible?” (21). Given his subsequent discussion, how should we answer this question?  As you respond, please integrate at least two concrete examples or direct citations from Hall’s chapter and use your analysis of them to help you explain his claims about queer history and identity. What’s significant about his discussion, especially in relation to fostering justice for queer folks? Aim for at least 250 words in your comment to this post. Make sure to take time to edit it for clarity and correctness.  I look forward to reading what you have to say!