Skip to main content

For queer calling call 1-800-LGBT, by Eileen Broome

To each their own. And in that own there is a connective line that pulls each person together into one. This group becomes one because their lives are no longer independent from each other and while there is no longer any independence, there is still uniqueness of situation amongst individuals. What makes Tony Kushner’s Angels in America so powerful and so queer is the uniqueness of each story line, but also the underlying connection that each character has with one another. Every relationship is queered by the impact of AIDS, in this case AIDS is viewed from the eyes of two queer men. Even the characters that do not directly interact with each other, feel each other’s impact and parallel each other.


Kushner manages to use this play to discuss a topic that during the 80’s was hardly ever discussed. The theme of miseducation about the victims of AIDS was common, in an interview CNN encounters a man, Edmund White, who recalls his AIDS/HIV activist work from the 80’s. He says that he and his friends wanted to,”urge prevention, but no one knew exactly what was causing the disease or how to control it”. The fear attached to AIDS was so powerful and well represented in the book. Louis leaves his lover Prior because he is simply too scared of  the idea of Prior having AIDS. When Roy finds out about having AIDS, he changes his diagnosis to liver cancer because he is to afraid of the stigma attached to the idea of who got AIDS and what it meant about them.


When the AIDS start to take over Prior, Belize and Louis steal Roy’s stash of medicine to help prolong Prior’s life. This was the only option available to Prior at the time, as it was the only option for many. The medicine for AIDS/HIV now is barely available or fully developed, whereas in the era of Prior, I cannot imagine the panic of having a disease with virtually no information as to what it is and no treatments available. CNN is a prime example of this, when recalling the fight to help during the height of the crisis, “they [White and friends] wanted to back research but didn't have enough funds; they wanted to sustain people who had the disease, even though there weren't effective treatments at the time. Also, they believed that society at large didn't care”.


When concluding the story lines of the characters, Kushner uses endings that could be considered queer. There is no neat conclusion, or ideal conclusion, for the characters, instead there is a queer sense of justice and freedom. Harper and Joe, whom almost always parallel each other, come out in their own ways. Joe finally admits he’s gay and starts to come to terms with it and Harper finally leaves the house. Roy dies in a confused state in the arms of Ethel Rosenberg, the ghost of a woman he lobbied for the death penalty for, believing she is his mother and he has finally gotten her to sing.

Louis slightly redeems himself by helping Belize take care of Prior, and Prior’s ending is the most heartbreaking and queer of all. In the last scene, Prior speaks to his friends, the audience and the world when he says, “This disease will be the end of many of us, but not nearly all, and the dead will be commemorated and will struggle on with the living, and we are not going away. We won't die secret deaths anymore. The world only spins forward. We will be citizens. The time has come. Bye now”. These last words of Prior reflect the struggle to be seen as a person and not just the disease. A struggle that claimed many lives before it opened up the eyes of America. One of the reasons this play is so powerful is because it looks into the lives of non perfect individuals and makes them prophets of the fights against AIDS. Kushner used this book to challenge what AIDS looked like and who it affected while also giving AIDS victims a face and a story. A story with characters that are so interesting and dynamic on many different levels, that they had to turn and listen, at least for a little bit to what they were saying and in that Kushner uses his writing to create words that stick with people.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog Post for Thursday, August 30—Welcome to “Justice, Gender, Sexuality”

Welcome to our course blog—“Justice, Gender, Sexuality”!  In this space, you’ll have the chance to reflect on our course reading, ask questions, interact with each other and build a virtual community to complement our classroom space. For this first post, I’d like to invite you to do two things:  First, tell us more about yourself.  What do you think we should know about you as we begin this semester together?  You might consider these questions:  Who are you?  How do you identify?  Where are you from?  To whom do you belong?  What communities are you a part of?  What values or beliefs do you hold dear?  Or, share some other facet about yourself that you think is significant.  You might also consider telling us more about why you decided to take this course, and what you hope to learn from it. Then, please reflect on the reading assigned for class.  Given what you’ve read, what do you think queer theories can do for us?  Or, put another way, what does Donald Hall mean by this word,

Blog Post for Tuesday, October 30: The Criminalization of Queer Folks

After reading the first two chapters of Queer Injustice (for class on Tuesday, October 30), use evidence from the reading to answer this question:  How have LGBTQIA+ folks been criminalized in the United States? (Put another way, how has U.S. culture, society, and law defined "queers as intrinsically criminal" (23)?) To help you get started, you might want to review briefly how our authors explain what they mean by the criminalization of queers (see p. 23, for a starting point). Then, please discuss two concrete examples of how queers have been criminalized in the U.S. Aim for at least 250 words in your comment.

Blog Post for Tuesday, November 27: Trans Feminism

After completing the reading for today, which comes from Julia Serano's book Excluded , take some time to reflect on her arguments about gender, feminism, and transgender identities and experiences.  For Serano, what is the role for trans women (and/or other trans people for that matter) in feminism? How does she understand and think through sex and gender as terms of analysis? Ultimately, how should feminists and/or other queer folks work to be more inclusive of transgender women? Aim for 250 words and make sure to integrate examples and citations from the text to anchor your analysis.