Skip to main content

The Freedom of Queerness, by Andrea Trevino

Learning from Hall’s remarks on queer theories, I believe we – students at a university who are free and privileged in learning about these topics – should indeed embrace the term queer especially in how it has commenced a conversation about LGBT justice. We have immense power in writing posts like these due to our education. Posts that share ideas and begin learning from each other about how we can individually begin a proper conversation and active change for those who are oppressed. A key point to begin a discussion such as Hall does is knowing how to define a word like queer while understanding how powerful language could be. All language is specialized language that anodes the interest of a specialized group. The definition that impacted me the most came from Hall’s chapter 2, more specifically David Halperin’s definition in Saint Foucalt: Towards a Gay Hagiography, “queer as a theoretical, activist, and identificatory position…queer identity need not be grounded in any positive truth or in any stable reality… queer is by definition whatever is at odds with the normal, the legitimate, the dominant. It is an identity without an essence” (Hall 67). This definition is the perfect example of why we should support the LGBT community if they wish to use this word. After long years and making of history in which this community has been at crossroads with how to define themselves, this word provides a kind of breakthrough and own characterization.

A main reason I decided to take this class derived from how my Intro to Women’s and Genders Studies class opened my eyes to my own individualism and how intersectionality plays a big part in our lives. Looking back at my life, I didn’t have much connection to or education about the LGBTQ community. I believe this is a shortcoming of attending a private Catholic school my whole life. Hall speaks of Robert Solomon and Kathleen Higgins’ work of What Nietzsche Really Said stating, “knowledge is always constrained by one’s perspective…and that perspective depends on our physiological constitution, our skills of inquiring and interpreting, our culture, and our language” (Hall 58). This goes hand in hand with how, where, and in what way we grew up along with all other experiences shape our way of viewing the world.
We, now speaking from a gender and racial minority standpoint which I strongly identify with and care for, can gain inspiration from what the term represents. It represents an umbrella, a term that brings community together while embracing intersectionality but more importantly being activists and calling out the faults within the community to which we associate with. Robert F. Reid-Pharr calls for an explicit ‘queer’ discussion of cross-racial sexual desire when stating, “lest we allow for the articulation of a queer subjectivity that never recognizes the differences we create and carry in our bodies, including not only race but gender, health, and age, to name only the most obvious categories” (Hall 93). With this in action, a greater group who takes on an additional identity will have the freedom and comfort to express all of themselves.

 In chapter 2, Hall states “ A critic may powerfully and accurately analyze the economic or gender-based oppression and still be thoroughly heterocentric or even explicitly homophobic” (Hall 90). It fosters justice in a way that reminds me of the third way of feminism. Kathleen Hanna and Bikini Kill’s Riot Grrrl Manifesto explains through a language of queer sexual sensibility and anarchist feminism how American media’s depiction of women is built upon capitalism and internalized sexism. It states “Because we are interested in creating non-hierarchical ways of being and making music, friends, and scenes based on communication + understanding, instead of competition + good / bad categorizations” (Hanna 396). Who are we to decide how to group things in good/bad categorizations? These ideas come from a rejection of limitations experienced even if we embrace this term. The simple fact of how the word queer was once meant to be derogatory and now serves as a word that fits no box but allows for those to choose it because it is filled with understanding and communication is how it fosters justice and prideful representation.

Comments

  1. Hi, great post! I espiecally like the fact that you pointed out your own experiences with the word "queer" and the LGBTQ+ community. I attended a public school all of my life and was never exposed to the LGBTQ+ community, so that says a lot! I think its interesting how you were able to connect the ways of feminism to how we society is so infixated on grouping us into cateogories. A question that your post raised for me is: Why is it that we are so stuck on labels and categories? And what happens when we disrupt those categories?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Interesting and informational post! I enjoy your engagement with multiple texts and authors; your work truly is in critical dialogue with other scholars. I particularly take note of your interlocution with Haperlin's conceptualization of queer, citing the nature of queer as that which is contrary to orthodoxy. When Haperlin claims that queer is without essence, might this also suggest that it does not carry an acute relation to the LGBTQ+ community? Or is this to say that queer is solely about radicalization from normalization? If so, is it then the case that queer can be divorced from it's relation to the community of the same name?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you, Andrea, for your post. I, too, appreciate gaining a clearer sense of your own interests in learning more about these issues and where you're coming from, as well as learning more about how your identities connect to this ongoing discussion. And I especially appreciate your engagement with points from our course reading that emphasize how our knowledge on any of these issues is constrained by our embodiments, and the need to push for a greater embrace of intersectionality within queer theory.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog Post for Thursday, August 30—Welcome to “Justice, Gender, Sexuality”

Welcome to our course blog—“Justice, Gender, Sexuality”!  In this space, you’ll have the chance to reflect on our course reading, ask questions, interact with each other and build a virtual community to complement our classroom space. For this first post, I’d like to invite you to do two things:  First, tell us more about yourself.  What do you think we should know about you as we begin this semester together?  You might consider these questions:  Who are you?  How do you identify?  Where are you from?  To whom do you belong?  What communities are you a part of?  What values or beliefs do you hold dear?  Or, share some other facet about yourself that you think is significant.  You might also consider telling us more about why you decided to take this course, and what you hope to learn from it. Then, please reflect on the reading assigned for class.  Given ...

Let's Embrace Queer! by Yael Greene

Starting from a very small age, probably starting at five or six years old, my parents, especially mymom, explained what it meant to be “gay,” “lesbian,” and “transgender,” just to start. All those talk were very positive, with the both of them reiterating that if my sisters and I ever felt that we were not straight or not identifying ourselves as females, they would continue to support and love us. As Igrew up, I heard more terms such as “asexual,” “pansexual,” and more! My mom and dad never changed their response about how they would fully love me no matter how I identified myself sexually or with my gender. The one thing they would add when we continued growing up was that the term “queer” is very derogatory and offensive towards people in the LGBTQIA+ community. I hated the word for a long time because of the negative history behind it. Nobody of any sexual orientation and gender identity deserves any form of hatred. Nowadays, the term “queer” has been reclaimed as a posit...

Blog Post for Tuesday, October 30: The Criminalization of Queer Folks

After reading the first two chapters of Queer Injustice (for class on Tuesday, October 30), use evidence from the reading to answer this question:  How have LGBTQIA+ folks been criminalized in the United States? (Put another way, how has U.S. culture, society, and law defined "queers as intrinsically criminal" (23)?) To help you get started, you might want to review briefly how our authors explain what they mean by the criminalization of queers (see p. 23, for a starting point). Then, please discuss two concrete examples of how queers have been criminalized in the U.S. Aim for at least 250 words in your comment.