Learning
from Hall’s remarks on queer theories, I believe we – students at a university
who are free and privileged in learning about these topics – should indeed
embrace the term queer especially in how it has commenced a conversation about
LGBT justice. We have immense power in writing posts like these due to our
education. Posts that share ideas and begin learning from each other about how
we can individually begin a proper conversation and active change for those who
are oppressed. A key point to begin a discussion such as Hall does is knowing
how to define a word like queer while understanding how powerful language could
be. All language is specialized language that anodes the interest of a
specialized group. The definition that impacted me the most came from Hall’s
chapter 2, more specifically David Halperin’s definition in Saint Foucalt: Towards a Gay Hagiography, “queer
as a theoretical, activist, and identificatory position…queer identity need not
be grounded in any positive truth or in any stable reality… queer is by definition
whatever is at odds with the normal,
the legitimate, the dominant. It is an identity without an essence” (Hall 67). This definition is the
perfect example of why we should support the LGBT community if they wish to use
this word. After long years and making of history in which this community has
been at crossroads with how to define themselves, this word provides a kind of breakthrough
and own characterization.
A
main reason I decided to take this class derived from how my Intro to Women’s
and Genders Studies class opened my eyes to my own individualism and how
intersectionality plays a big part in our lives. Looking back at my life, I didn’t
have much connection to or education about the LGBTQ community. I believe this
is a shortcoming of attending a private Catholic school my whole life. Hall
speaks of Robert Solomon and Kathleen Higgins’ work of What Nietzsche Really Said stating, “knowledge is always
constrained by one’s perspective…and that perspective depends on our physiological
constitution, our skills of inquiring and interpreting, our culture, and our
language” (Hall 58). This goes hand in hand with how, where,
and in what way we grew up along with all other experiences shape our way of
viewing the world.
We,
now speaking from a gender and racial minority standpoint which I strongly identify
with and care for, can gain inspiration from what the term represents. It
represents an umbrella, a term that brings community together while embracing
intersectionality but more importantly being activists and calling out the
faults within the community to which we associate with. Robert F. Reid-Pharr
calls for an explicit ‘queer’ discussion of cross-racial sexual desire when
stating, “lest we allow for the articulation of a queer subjectivity that never
recognizes the differences we create and carry in our bodies, including not
only race but gender, health, and age, to name only the most obvious categories”
(Hall 93). With this in action, a
greater group who takes on an additional identity will have the freedom and
comfort to express all of themselves.
In chapter 2, Hall states “ A critic may
powerfully and accurately analyze the economic or gender-based oppression and
still be thoroughly heterocentric or even explicitly homophobic” (Hall 90). It fosters justice in a way
that reminds me of the third way of feminism. Kathleen Hanna and Bikini Kill’s Riot Grrrl Manifesto explains through a
language of queer sexual sensibility and anarchist feminism how American media’s
depiction of women is built upon capitalism and internalized sexism. It states “Because
we are interested in creating non-hierarchical ways of being and making music,
friends, and scenes based on communication + understanding, instead of
competition + good / bad categorizations” (Hanna
396). Who are we to decide how to group things in good/bad categorizations?
These ideas come from a rejection of limitations experienced even if we embrace
this term. The simple fact of how the word queer was once meant to be derogatory
and now serves as a word that fits no box but allows for those to choose it because
it is filled with understanding and communication is how it fosters justice and
prideful representation.
Hi, great post! I espiecally like the fact that you pointed out your own experiences with the word "queer" and the LGBTQ+ community. I attended a public school all of my life and was never exposed to the LGBTQ+ community, so that says a lot! I think its interesting how you were able to connect the ways of feminism to how we society is so infixated on grouping us into cateogories. A question that your post raised for me is: Why is it that we are so stuck on labels and categories? And what happens when we disrupt those categories?
ReplyDeleteInteresting and informational post! I enjoy your engagement with multiple texts and authors; your work truly is in critical dialogue with other scholars. I particularly take note of your interlocution with Haperlin's conceptualization of queer, citing the nature of queer as that which is contrary to orthodoxy. When Haperlin claims that queer is without essence, might this also suggest that it does not carry an acute relation to the LGBTQ+ community? Or is this to say that queer is solely about radicalization from normalization? If so, is it then the case that queer can be divorced from it's relation to the community of the same name?
ReplyDeleteThank you, Andrea, for your post. I, too, appreciate gaining a clearer sense of your own interests in learning more about these issues and where you're coming from, as well as learning more about how your identities connect to this ongoing discussion. And I especially appreciate your engagement with points from our course reading that emphasize how our knowledge on any of these issues is constrained by our embodiments, and the need to push for a greater embrace of intersectionality within queer theory.
ReplyDelete