Skip to main content

Queer History, now what is that? by Caitlyn Caniglia


In the years of taking history classes all throughout elementary to high school I have not discussed any of the topic that were brought up in this past lesson. Why have I not covered Queer History throughout my time in school? Shouldn't this automatically be incorporated into my history lessons? These are issues I have with this not being taught in classes because it is a large part of history. I have been in school for 12+ years and this is the first instance of me being taught about historical movements such as the Homophile movement, and the follow up of stonewall. These large historical movements happened in the 50’s-60’s important and revolutionary times for America so how is this not brought up? I believe it is left out of texts because Queer history is not a majority, meaning it does not apply to heteronormative standards. 

What has made queer resistance possible and effective? I think that it is important to study the history of queer activism due to the fact that it has shaped a lot of history even if it has not been shown throughout the textbooks used in regular classes. An example that is not talked about in text books is the Homophile Years where, “Various branches and agencies of the national government in Washington investigated, exposed, excluded, harassed, purged, and spied upon gay Americans.” (D’Emilio, 3) This is not included within the history textbooks which is a larger part of the 50’s and empowered the 60’s movements post stonewall. It is important to look at the way that Americans have been treated that were queer at this time period. The time of the early 50’s did not allow for people to be out, so there was not a visible community available. This was a push for the community since no one truly knew who was out and could be punished with loss of job and social community if out. The use of police presence was around even at the end of 1969 when the raiding of bars was still happening. The active police presence plus the anger of the LGBT+ community created a outrage, especially amongst the drag queens. The way to best describe it would be “It was this problem —how to challenge the regime of the closet — that the Stonewall Riot and its aftermath appeared to solve. The Stonewall generation of gay liberationists crashed through the recruitment barrier and landed in a wide sunlit space that for many, proved far more attractive than the closet.” (D’Emilio 4) This is some of the first very public resistance which was effective. This created a safe space and community for people to   come out. The movements also coincided with the civil rights which helped to make the publication of protests wide spread. So, how does this history create a possibility for queer resistance? It allows for the movements that we have today to be around. Had it not have been for these Queer people fighting to break the boundaries there would be no pride, no coming out, and no community. 

Why is it important for contemporary queer activists to know and understand queer history? As discussed previously the events in history were important in the formation of todays community. I think another important historical event would be the beginning of pride, “The assimilation of pride into this very marrow of the movement also meant that, even as reformers campaigned for inclusion, activists were willing to to absorb unruly tactics into their repertoire of methods to achieve their goals.”(D’Emilio 12)  The formation is something that queer activists should know today so that they know why it started. Post stonewall transformations are also not shown within the textbooks, “There was less discrimination and harassment, greater visibility, and a much larger and more congenial gay world.” (D’Emilio 19) This is yet another reason to understand queer history for queer activists because we are not taught about it within classes. There is no way that I would have known about the details of any of these movements had I not taken this class. The importance of the understanding of queer history is so that we can educate others upon the past. In order for visibility of the past, we must educate so that others can learn from the past and know why being queer is a very valuable and precious thing. Queer history is important to the development of our future to see how hard people fought for what we have today. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Blog Post for Thursday, August 30—Welcome to “Justice, Gender, Sexuality”

Welcome to our course blog—“Justice, Gender, Sexuality”!  In this space, you’ll have the chance to reflect on our course reading, ask questions, interact with each other and build a virtual community to complement our classroom space. For this first post, I’d like to invite you to do two things:  First, tell us more about yourself.  What do you think we should know about you as we begin this semester together?  You might consider these questions:  Who are you?  How do you identify?  Where are you from?  To whom do you belong?  What communities are you a part of?  What values or beliefs do you hold dear?  Or, share some other facet about yourself that you think is significant.  You might also consider telling us more about why you decided to take this course, and what you hope to learn from it. Then, please reflect on the reading assigned for class.  Given ...

Blog Post for Tuesday, September 11: Intersectional Queerness

In preparation for Tuesday's class, I'd like you to do two things:  First, take a moment to reflect on the Brave Space Training.  What did you learn from this experience, and how are thinking and feeling about queer issues after last week's training? Second, identify a key issue or point from Hall's third chapter--"Queering Class, Race, Gender, and Sexual Understanding"--that you take to be central to understanding his larger argument in this chapter.  What is his point?  And what does he write (so make sure to integrate at least one quotation/citation from his writing that helps you in your analysis) that helps convey this point?  Last,  why do you think this point is important and what question(s) does it raise for you that you would like the rest of us to discuss in class on Tuesday? As usual, please aim for at least 250 words.  Include a quotation (cited, with page number) from the text, and take care to edit your response.  Thank you!

Blog Post for Tuesday, September 4: The Question of Queer History

Donald Hall opens our reading for Tuesday, by asking, “Is a ‘queer’ history even possible?” (21). Given his subsequent discussion, how should we answer this question?  As you respond, please integrate at least two concrete examples or direct citations from Hall’s chapter and use your analysis of them to help you explain his claims about queer history and identity. What’s significant about his discussion, especially in relation to fostering justice for queer folks? Aim for at least 250 words in your comment to this post. Make sure to take time to edit it for clarity and correctness.  I look forward to reading what you have to say!