Skip to main content

"Call it What You Want?" by Eileen Broome

To write history means to write the facts about what happened in a non-bias sense.
Now, history can hardly ever get all the facts, but what about when sections are erased? Transgender people have their own section of queer history they can Transgender/Transsexual history due to the lack of inclusivity in queer history.  Hall explains that it is so hard to define queer history because by nature, “‘a’ queer history is nevertheless a problematic one. One of the most useful insights of late twentieth century critical theory ... is that ‘history’ is always an artificial construct”.


But queer history generally lives in the land of sometimes claiming things as queer simply because it was unusual at the time and it links to liberation somehow. So why would it not be inclusive of transgender history? Namaste defies queer theory as exclusive and defines it is “absolute neglect of everyday life for transgender people” and claims it, “exhibits a remarkable insensitivity to the substantive issues of transgendered people's everyday lives”.A huge chunk of transgender history, which is queer history, has not been recorded. Thus writing queer history is negating a huge portion of it.


A struggle that was clearly not documented as well as it should have been was and still is HIV + and AIDS.  AIDS is a struggle that hit the transgender community hard. Per the CDC of the roughly 1 million adults in the US who identify as transgender, ”2,351 transgender people were diagnosed with HIV”. Among HIV testing, of more than 3 million people, “the percentage of transgender people who received a new HIV diagnosis was more than 3 times the national average”.  This fear of AIDS was a huge silencer of the not just the ability to record and write history, but was a oppressor and killer to the Transgender community with AIDS. Faderman talks about how "[Ronald] Regan himself wouldn't even utter the word AIDS until his good friend from Hollywood days, Rocky Hudson died of it in 1985" (418).

Hall notes something that could be seen as a possible explanation to why transgender history was not recorded, “It was commonly feared that simply discussing sexual nonconformity would give people ideas about forms of sexual expression and gratification”. Since those notions were rarely expressed they are now rarely understood fully. To not understand where something came from, means to diminish their struggle amongst other queer struggles. When you can’t write a history for a group you leave it in the past and can you really call something history if it isn’t known in the present?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Blog Post for Thursday, August 30—Welcome to “Justice, Gender, Sexuality”

Welcome to our course blog—“Justice, Gender, Sexuality”!  In this space, you’ll have the chance to reflect on our course reading, ask questions, interact with each other and build a virtual community to complement our classroom space. For this first post, I’d like to invite you to do two things:  First, tell us more about yourself.  What do you think we should know about you as we begin this semester together?  You might consider these questions:  Who are you?  How do you identify?  Where are you from?  To whom do you belong?  What communities are you a part of?  What values or beliefs do you hold dear?  Or, share some other facet about yourself that you think is significant.  You might also consider telling us more about why you decided to take this course, and what you hope to learn from it. Then, please reflect on the reading assigned for class.  Given ...

Let's Embrace Queer! by Yael Greene

Starting from a very small age, probably starting at five or six years old, my parents, especially mymom, explained what it meant to be “gay,” “lesbian,” and “transgender,” just to start. All those talk were very positive, with the both of them reiterating that if my sisters and I ever felt that we were not straight or not identifying ourselves as females, they would continue to support and love us. As Igrew up, I heard more terms such as “asexual,” “pansexual,” and more! My mom and dad never changed their response about how they would fully love me no matter how I identified myself sexually or with my gender. The one thing they would add when we continued growing up was that the term “queer” is very derogatory and offensive towards people in the LGBTQIA+ community. I hated the word for a long time because of the negative history behind it. Nobody of any sexual orientation and gender identity deserves any form of hatred. Nowadays, the term “queer” has been reclaimed as a posit...

Blog Post for Tuesday, October 30: The Criminalization of Queer Folks

After reading the first two chapters of Queer Injustice (for class on Tuesday, October 30), use evidence from the reading to answer this question:  How have LGBTQIA+ folks been criminalized in the United States? (Put another way, how has U.S. culture, society, and law defined "queers as intrinsically criminal" (23)?) To help you get started, you might want to review briefly how our authors explain what they mean by the criminalization of queers (see p. 23, for a starting point). Then, please discuss two concrete examples of how queers have been criminalized in the U.S. Aim for at least 250 words in your comment.